Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Henning vs Saba Purtseladze Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Henning vs Purtseladze analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Henning vs Saba Purtseladze Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Henning 1 - 0 Purtseladze
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Henning has won 56.67% of points on his second serve, while Purtseladze has won 49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Henning, in recent form, has won 54.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while Purtseladze has won 51.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.98% and 29.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Henning has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Purtseladze has saved 60.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Henning has won 85.71% of matches played (W/L 42/ 7), with Purtseladze winning 48.65% (W/L 36/ 38) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4). Purtseladze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 116/ 81), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 17/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 42/ 7), where as Purtseladze has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.39% of matches (W/L 31/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Henning winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Henning winning 2 and Purtseladze winning 0. The last match between Henning and Purtseladze was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 21-02-2024, First, Hard with Philip Henning getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Henning and Purtseladze have played a deciding set 0 times, with Henning winning 0 times and Purtseladze 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Henning winning 0, and Purtseladze 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Henning has played against opponents with an average rank of 104.59 while Purtseladze has played against players with an average rank of 135.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Henning has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Purtseladze has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Henning has converted 47.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Purtseladze has converted 43.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Henning 1 - 0 Purtseladze
526
Rank
526
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
616
Rank
424
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
80% (51-13)
Career Total W/L
52% (136-128)
86% (19-3)
YTD W/L
55% (16-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Henning VS Purtseladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Philip Henning | Saba Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (43/57) | 55% (37/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (30/43) | 73% (27/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 79% (11/14) | 33% (10/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (30/67) | 28% (16/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Henning VS Purtseladze H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Philip Henning
Player
Saba Purtseladze
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Henning | Saba Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 86% (19/3) | 55% (16/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 80% (39/10) | 51% (36/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (275/185) | 51% (350/343) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 92% (12/1) | 63% (15/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.76 |
| Aces Total | 74 | 259 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 20 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:49 | 1:37:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.27 | 105.72 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (969/1396) | 60% (1136/1904) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (663/969) | 74% (844/1136) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (242/427) | 49% (380/768) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (87/182) | 40% (64/161) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (678/1515) | 36% (696/1924) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (19/3) | 58% (15/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 86% (19/22) | 55% (16/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 43% (6/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 67% (8/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 60% (5/3) | 29% (17/5) |
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Chirag Duhan
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kabir Hans
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
9 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Philip Henning
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Aleksandre Metreveli
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kokoro Isomura
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
106)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Manuel Mazza
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Mikhail Korovin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
85%
(
22 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Bosio
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Saba Purtseladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Saba Purtseladze
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
6
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
37 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Saba Purtseladze
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Saba Purtseladze
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
76)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
Saba Purtseladze
62%
(
75 of
121)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
116)
12
Aces
22
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
54 of
67)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
119
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Daniel Khazime
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
6
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Saba Purtseladze
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Alp Horoz
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Kumstat
Player
Saba Purtseladze
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
18
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
54 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Amr Elsayed
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
18
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Henning Vs Purtseladze Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Philip Henning
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
